diff --git a/.changeset/20400-datasource-waiver-missing-only.md b/.changeset/20400-datasource-waiver-missing-only.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d9d2723b4f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.changeset/20400-datasource-waiver-missing-only.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+---
+'@objectstack/lint': patch
+---
+
+`component-props-invalid` no longer hides a wrong `object` prop on a component that also carries a `dataSource` binding
+
+Clause-②: no
+
+A page component whose `dataSource.object` names the object may leave the flat
+`properties.object` shorthand out: the binding supplies it, so the rule does not
+report the props schema's required `object` as missing. That waiver was matched
+on the issue's path alone, so it also swallowed every other issue the props
+schema raised at `object`. A present but wrong value, such as `object: 7` or
+`object: null`, was reported without a binding and silently passed with one.
+
+The waiver now covers what its contract says: a missing `object`, meaning no
+key or an explicit `undefined`. A value the author did write is judged as
+written, and it is reported at `properties.object` exactly as it is on the same
+component without a binding.
+
+Effect on `os validate`, `os lint` and `os build`: a document that sets both a
+`dataSource` binding and a wrong-typed `properties.object` now gets one
+`component-props-invalid` warning it did not get before. The rule stays
+advisory: without `--strict` nothing that validated before is refused; under
+`os validate --strict` or `os lint --strict` the new warning fails the run, as
+every warning does. A component that binds
+through `dataSource` and omits `properties.object` is still clean.
diff --git a/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.test.ts b/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.test.ts
index 776b8b641df..96035d4f925 100644
--- a/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.test.ts
+++ b/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.test.ts
@@ -231,6 +231,58 @@ describe('validateComponentProps — value verdicts', () => {
     ]);
   });
 
+  /**
+   * The waiver above covers a MISSING `object` only — no key, or `undefined`.
+   * A present value the row rejects is the author's own, and the binding
+   * supplies nothing in its place, so the row's verdict on it must reach the
+   * author exactly as it does with no binding at all. Each case is judged
+   * twice, beside the binding and without it, and the two answers must be the
+   * same finding: equality rather than wording, so the pin measures that the
+   * waiver lets the row's issue through unchanged.
+   */
+  it.each([
+    ['a number', 7],
+    ['null', null],
+  ])('reports a present-but-wrong `object` (%s) beside a `dataSource` binding, as it does without one', (_label, value) => {
+    const component = { type: 'element:number', properties: { object: value, aggregate: 'count' } };
+    const withBinding = validateComponentProps(
+      stackWith([{ ...component, dataSource: { object: 'contact' } }]),
+    );
+    const without = validateComponentProps(stackWith([component]));
+
+    // Control first: with nothing supplying `object`, the row reports it.
+    expect(without.map((f) => [f.rule, f.path])).toEqual([
+      [COMPONENT_PROPS_INVALID, 'pages[0].regions[0].components[0].properties.object'],
+    ]);
+    // The binding does not silence it.
+    expect(withBinding.map((f) => [f.rule, f.path])).toEqual([
+      [COMPONENT_PROPS_INVALID, 'pages[0].regions[0].components[0].properties.object'],
+    ]);
+    expect(withBinding).toEqual(without);
+  });
+
+  it('still waives `object: undefined` beside a binding — an explicit undefined is a missing value', () => {
+    const findings = validateComponentProps(
+      stackWith([
+        {
+          type: 'element:number',
+          dataSource: { object: 'contact' },
+          properties: { object: undefined, aggregate: 'count' },
+        },
+      ]),
+    );
+    expect(findings).toEqual([]);
+
+    // …and the same bag with no binding is reported, so the silence above is
+    // the waiver and not the row accepting `undefined`.
+    const without = validateComponentProps(
+      stackWith([{ type: 'element:number', properties: { object: undefined, aggregate: 'count' } }]),
+    );
+    expect(invalid(without).map((f) => f.path)).toEqual([
+      'pages[0].regions[0].components[0].properties.object',
+    ]);
+  });
+
   /**
    * #5775 — the retirement's author-facing channel. `displayField` was the
    * picker's REQUIRED prop and no renderer ever read it, so the tombstone's
diff --git a/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.ts b/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.ts
index 2b6bcb7bdae..f4793c57828 100644
--- a/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.ts
+++ b/packages/lint/src/validate-component-props.ts
@@ -175,7 +175,13 @@ const DATASOURCE_SUPPLIED_PROP = 'object';
 function suppliedByDataSource(issue: LintZodIssue, component: AnyRec): boolean {
   if (issue.path.length !== 1 || issue.path[0] !== DATASOURCE_SUPPLIED_PROP) return false;
   const dataSource = isRec(component.dataSource) ? component.dataSource : undefined;
-  return strName(dataSource?.object) !== undefined;
+  if (strName(dataSource?.object) === undefined) return false;
+  // "Missing" is read off the component, never off the issue: the path alone
+  // also matches a PRESENT value the row rejects (`object: 7`, `object: null`),
+  // and the binding supplies nothing there — the author wrote that value and
+  // the row's own verdict on it stands. Only no key, or `undefined`, is waived.
+  const props = isRec(component.properties) ? component.properties : undefined;
+  return props?.[DATASOURCE_SUPPLIED_PROP] === undefined;
 }
 
 /**