RFC-001: Multi-Agent Visual Indicator for Active Sessions - #818
Open
vikramrajj wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
RFC-001: Multi-Agent Visual Indicator for Active Sessions#818vikramrajj wants to merge 1 commit into
vikramrajj wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Draft RFC for showing active agents in session with visual indicators. Includes TypeScript interfaces, component designs, and integration approach. Co-authored-by: CommandCodeBot <noreply@commandcode.ai>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds RFC-001 — a detailed design proposal for implementing a multi-agent visual indicator in the Command Code CLI, as requested in issue #817.
What's Included
rfcs/001-multi-agent-visual-indicator.md) with:AgentBadge,AgentStatusBar)Key Design Decisions
compact(default),detailed,minimalagentIndicatorsettings objectVisual Inspiration
Next Steps
If approved, implementation would proceed in three phases:
Related issue: #817