Skip to content

update serverless codeowners - #12412

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
onzia/update-serverless-codeowners
Sep 15, 2026
Merged

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
onzia/update-serverless-codeowners

Conversation

@ojproductions

@ojproductions ojproductions commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

updates codeowners to be more reflective of serverless owned files

Motivation

apm-idm-java doesnt work in aws-java. serverless does

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

@ojproductions
ojproductions requested a review from a team as a code owner September 4, 2026 15:11
@ojproductions
ojproductions requested review from AlexeyKuznetsov-DD and removed request for a team September 4, 2026 15:11
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! 👋 Thanks for your pull request! 🎉

To help us review it, please make sure to:

  • Add at least one type, and one component or instrumentation label to the pull request

If you need help, please check our contributing guidelines.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-04T15:14:00.185664Z 46d8394 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@ojproductions ojproductions changed the title update sereverless codewoners update serverless codewoners Sep 4, 2026
@ojproductions ojproductions added the tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes label Sep 4, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 46d839430a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The CODEOWNERS rules assign AWS Java, Lambda, Azure Functions, and inferred proxy files to the serverless team. The rules keep the data streams team for SNS and SQS paths.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 46d8394 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

@ojproductions
ojproductions requested review from a team September 4, 2026 17:55
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 13.97 s 13.94 s [-0.6%; +1.0%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.99 s 13.00 s [-0.9%; +0.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.59 s 16.86 s [-0.0%; +8.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.39 s 17.46 s [-1.2%; +0.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.46 s 17.22 s [+0.2%; +2.5%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.51 s 16.74 s [-0.9%; +10.1%] (unstable)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.45 s 16.68 s [-2.6%; -0.2%] (maybe better)

Commit: 8424180b · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@ojproductions ojproductions changed the title update serverless codewoners update serverless codeowners Sep 4, 2026

@johannbotha johannbotha left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 for DSM

@ojproductions
ojproductions requested review from a team and vandonr and removed request for a team September 15, 2026 14:46

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: FAIL

Later CODEOWNERS rules still send AWS Gradle lockfiles and DSM test files to @DataDog/apm-idm-java. The new directory rule does not give @DataDog/apm-serverless ownership of all aws-java files.

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit f83eb75 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS

@jordan-wong jordan-wong left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense these are definitely more serverless than IDM - thanks LGTM

@ojproductions
ojproductions added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 15, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-15 15:35:59 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-15 15:36:04 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-09-15 15:52:17 UTC 🚨 MergeQueue: This merge request is in error because of DDCI

DDCI pipeline didn't start (sourcing_failed)... Please retry.

DDCI Change Request: 4751791833980224432
You can get help from #ci-infra-support

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 15, 2026
@ojproductions
ojproductions added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 15, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-15 18:27:41 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-15 18:27:47 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-09-15 19:29:45 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 15, 2026
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 4c983f4 into master Sep 15, 2026
603 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the onzia/update-serverless-codeowners branch September 15, 2026 19:29
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Sep 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants