Skip to content

ci: bump apm-sdks-benchmarks pin to include S3 upload support - #12531

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/bump-apm-sdks-benchmarks-pin-s3-upload
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
augusto/bump-apm-sdks-benchmarks-pin-s3-upload

Conversation

@igoragoli

@igoragoli igoragoli commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Bumps the apm-sdks-benchmarks include pin (&apm_sdks_benchmarks_sha, shared by all five includes: spring-petclinic, load, startup, dacapo, post-pr-comment) from 0899730b to current apm-sdks-benchmarks main HEAD (fac3cc72).

Motivation

The old pin predates 346ee41 (uploading results to S3), and we need it for monitoring benchmark flakiness: https://github.com/DataDog/benchmarking-platform-tools/tree/main/scripts/stability#stability-monitoring-ci

Additional Notes

Two open PRs from the "Update apm-sdks-benchmarks reference" automation (#12418, #12479) attempt the same bump. Merging either of those or this PR resolves it.

Jira ticket: APMSP-3925

How to test the change?

Already validated that the S3 uploading works on a separate branch: https://gitlab.ddbuild.io/DataDog/benchmarking-platform-tools/-/jobs/2018290453 shows we can successfully fetch results from S3 for monitoring benchmark flakiness.

The ref pinned for the five apm-sdks-benchmarks includes (spring-petclinic,
load, startup, dacapo, post-pr-comment) predates apm-sdks-benchmarks
commit 346ee41 ("feat: upload parallel benchmark results to S3 (#251)"),
so .gitlab/templates/upload-results.yml does not exist at that commit and
these jobs' S3 upload path is broken on master today.

Already validated on a separate branch, augusto/test-java-macrobenchmark-stability,
pinned to an earlier post-346ee41 commit: a real stability-monitoring run
there collected 500 .converted.json files across 10 samples, 103 scenarios,
14 metrics. This bumps master itself to current apm-sdks-benchmarks main.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@igoragoli
igoragoli marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2026 16:03
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested review from a team as code owners September 16, 2026 16:03
@igoragoli
igoragoli requested review from amarziali and randomanderson and removed request for a team September 16, 2026 16:03
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-16T16:06:02.129451Z 511e454 Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review Completed 2026-09-16T16:06:53.834402Z 511e454 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM label Sep 16, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi! 👋 Thanks for your pull request! 🎉

To help us review it, please make sure to:

  • Add at least one type, and one component or instrumentation label to the pull request

If you need help, please check our contributing guidelines.

@datadog-datadog-us1-prod

This comment has been minimized.

@datadog-datadog-us1-prod datadog-datadog-us1-prod Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Datadog Autotest: PASS

More details

The new SHA remains on the shared anchor, so all five benchmark includes use the same revision.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit 511e454 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟡 Java Benchmark SLOs — Performance SLO warning (near threshold)

Suite Status
Startup 🟡 warning

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 13.99 s 13.92 s [-0.2%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.95 s 13.00 s [-1.4%; +0.6%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.56 s 17.46 s [-0.1%; +1.2%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.35 s 17.56 s [-2.0%; -0.5%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 17.14 s 17.20 s [-1.3%; +0.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.57 s 17.48 s [-0.4%; +1.5%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.18 s 16.71 s [-7.5%; +1.0%] (no difference)

Commit: 7bc535dc · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@sarahchen6 sarahchen6 added tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes comp: tooling Build & Tooling labels Sep 16, 2026

@amarziali amarziali left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Please keep the pin comment durable across automated updates. The weekly update script replaces only the SHA, so the current “apm-sdks-benchmarks#261 merge commit” text will become stale on the next bump. Restoring the generic “pinned by Update apm-sdks-benchmarks reference workflow” wording would avoid that. This is non-blocking.

@igoragoli
igoragoli enabled auto-merge September 17, 2026 07:31
@igoragoli
igoragoli added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 17, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-17 08:18:42 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-17 08:18:47 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-09-17 09:20:40 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 17, 2026
@igoragoli
igoragoli added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 17, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-17 08:59:35 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-17 08:59:37 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status in_progress

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 17, 2026
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 40d1adc into master Sep 17, 2026
595 of 606 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the augusto/bump-apm-sdks-benchmarks-pin-s3-upload branch September 17, 2026 09:20
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Sep 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants