Skip to content

Update OTel operator variables for one-pipeline 1.5.3 - #12536

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
dinesh.gurumurthy/use-one-pipeline-1.5.1
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
dinesh.gurumurthy/use-one-pipeline-1.5.1

Conversation

@dineshg13

@dineshg13 dineshg13 commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What Does This Do

Updates the OpenTelemetry Operator image controls to the CI_OTEL_OPERATOR_* variable names and updates the locked one-pipeline template from 1.5.1 to 1.5.3.

Motivation

DataDog/libdatadog-build#259 prefixed these build-only controls with CI_ so tracer configuration does not interpret them as OpenTelemetry SDK settings. Using one-pipeline 1.5.3 keeps this consumer on the latest published template containing that interface.

Additional Notes

  • Verified the one-pipeline 1.5.3 template consumes CI_OTEL_OPERATOR_IMAGES_ENABLED and CI_OTEL_OPERATOR_LANGUAGE.
  • Ran ./gradlew spotlessApply successfully.
  • git diff --check passes.
  • The PR pipeline validates the generated one-pipeline image jobs.
  • No runtime tests or release notes are needed because this changes only GitLab CI configuration.

Follow-up to #12255. Equivalent consumer update to DataDog/dd-trace-py#20239.

Contributor Checklist

  • Format the title according to the contribution guidelines.
  • Assign the required type:, comp:, and AI-generated labels.
  • No source files, public documentation, or runtime behavior are changed.

Jira ticket: N/A

@dineshg13 dineshg13 added type: bug fix Bug fix tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM labels Sep 16, 2026
@datadog-prod-us1-5

datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 59.09% (-0.00%)

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 26b544f | Docs | Give us feedback!

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 14.01 s 13.92 s [-0.4%; +1.7%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.85 s 12.97 s [-1.7%; -0.2%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 16.92 s 16.33 s [-0.7%; +8.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 16.88 s 16.86 s [-0.8%; +1.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 16.20 s 16.77 s [-7.6%; +0.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 16.78 s 16.64 s [-0.1%; +1.7%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.09 s 16.04 s [-0.7%; +1.3%] (no difference)

Commit: 26b544f8 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@dineshg13
dineshg13 marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2026 17:22
@dineshg13
dineshg13 requested review from a team as code owners September 16, 2026 17:22
@dineshg13
dineshg13 requested review from bric3 and erikayasuda and removed request for a team September 16, 2026 17:22
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-16T17:24:22.419974Z e67ed89 Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-16T17:25:33.121987Z e67ed89 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@datadog-prod-us1-5 datadog-prod-us1-5 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Autotest was unable to complete this review. View session

Please try again by commenting @autotest review.

@dineshg13 dineshg13 changed the title Update OTel operator variables for one-pipeline 1.5.1 Update OTel operator variables for one-pipeline 1.5.3 Sep 18, 2026
@dineshg13
dineshg13 added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-18 14:49:00 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-09-18 14:49:06 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-09-18 16:02:57 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 18, 2026
@dineshg13
dineshg13 removed the request for review from erikayasuda September 18, 2026 14:49
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 2806ee2 into master Sep 18, 2026
606 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the dinesh.gurumurthy/use-one-pipeline-1.5.1 branch September 18, 2026 16:02
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Sep 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: tooling Build & Tooling tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: bug fix Bug fix

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants