Use configured repository proxy in embedded Maven tests

[AlexeyKuznetsov-DD]

What Does This Do

Routes embedded Maven test builds and their dependency-prefetch step through the configured Maven repository proxy. Both test harnesses select a shared mirrorOf=* settings file when MAVEN_REPOSITORY_PROXY is present, and Gradle propagates mavenRepositoryProxy to all test tasks in the module.

Motivation

The embedded MavenCli instances do not inherit Gradle's repository configuration. They continued contacting Maven Central directly after the other repository paths were migrated, causing intermittent HTTP 429 failures before the test assertions could run.

This extends the proxy-only approach from #12403, #12404, and #12491 to the Maven instrumentation tests, following the existing Maven smoke-test mirror configuration. Builds without a configured proxy retain their existing repository behavior.

Additional Notes

The failing Surefire 2.17 invocation reported:

HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Your ip has exceeded rate limits.
Could not transfer artifact org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:pom:2.17
from/to central (https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): Too Many Requests (429)

org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: expected: <true> but was: <false>
    at datadog.trace.instrumentation.maven3.AbstractMavenTest.executeMaven(AbstractMavenTest.java:70)
    at datadog.trace.instrumentation.maven3.MavenUtilsTest.testGetMojoConfigValueReturnsConfiguredValue(MavenUtilsTest.java:106)

Plugin resolution failed before the MojoStarted callback, leaving the helper's handlerRan flag false. The same POM downloaded successfully about 4.5 seconds later in another invocation, confirming the transient external failure.

Validation with the repository proxies configured, CI=true, and Java 8:

./gradlew :dd-java-agent:instrumentation:maven:maven-3.2.1:test \
  :dd-java-agent:instrumentation:maven:maven-3.2.1:latestDepTest -PtestJvm=8

• Default Maven suite: 48 passed, 32 skipped, 0 failures.
• Latest Maven suite: 75 passed, 5 skipped, 0 failures.
• Across both suites, Maven output recorded 651 download attempts through the configured proxy and zero direct Maven Central downloads.
• Module formatting and final diff checks passed.

Contributor Checklist

• Title follows the contribution guidelines.
• Required type, component, AI-generated, and no-release-notes labels applied.
• The new settings resource is covered by the existing Maven instrumentation CODEOWNERS rule.
• No public configuration or documentation changes required.
• Opened as a draft; use merge queue after approval.

Jira ticket: N/A

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-18T19:33:46.433568Z	e2904f3	Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-18T19:34:47.484135Z	e2904f3	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sbt-scalatest

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	-26.79	55.43	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -82.22	55.43	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -82.22	66/216
agentEvpProxy	-26.70	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	-

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

More details

The proxy setting reaches each Maven test task. Each embedded Maven call uses the mirror file only when the proxy environment variable exists.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit e2904f3 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2]

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 59.10% (-0.02%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: 5014a72 | Docs | Give us feedback!}

[dd-octo-sts]

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	14.79 s	14.66 s	[+0.0%; +1.7%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	13.60 s	13.70 s	[-1.3%; -0.0%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.03 s	16.87 s	[+0.0%; +1.9%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	17.01 s	16.47 s	[-1.1%; +7.6%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	16.74 s	16.87 s	[-1.9%; +0.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	16.94 s	16.76 s	[-0.1%; +2.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.19 s	15.72 s	[-1.2%; +7.2%] (no difference)

Commit: 5014a72b · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

---

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - jolokia

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	94.65	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.42	93.23	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.42	34/122
agentless	90.72	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.14	89.58	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.14	34/120
agentlessCodeCoverage	99.06	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.06	99.00	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.06	35/120
agentlessLineCoverage	100.07	101.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.93	101.00	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.93	36/126

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - nebula-release-plugin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	37.01	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.59	36.42	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.59	35/118
agentless	36.40	35.70	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.70	35.70	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.70	35/118
agentlessCodeCoverage	43.33	44.48	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.15	44.48	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -1.15	35/118
agentlessLineCoverage	62.29	56.55	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +5.74	55.43	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +6.86	34/118

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - heliboard

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	11.70	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.78	10.13	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.57	32/109

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - reactive-streams-jvm

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	22.97	21.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.32	21.65	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.32	32/123
agentless	19.76	18.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.94	18.82	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.94	31/115
agentlessCodeCoverage	20.98	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.99	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.99	31/114
agentlessLineCoverage	27.36	26.45	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.91	26.98	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.38	15/57

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - netflix-zuul

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	40.78	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -47.02	87.80	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -47.02	37/116
agentless	34.04	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -47.01	81.05	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -47.01	34/112
agentlessCodeCoverage	45.94	97.04	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -51.10	95.12	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -49.18	34/112
agentlessLineCoverage	58.40	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -53.22	111.62	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -53.22	35/117

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-kotlin

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	-41.71	12.87	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -54.58	12.87	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -54.58	34/120
agentless	-41.89	11.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -53.77	11.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -53.77	32/111
agentlessCodeCoverage	-39.76	15.41	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -55.17	15.11	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -54.87	32/111
agentlessLineCoverage	-38.81	17.03	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -55.84	17.38	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -56.19	32/112

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - okhttp

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	21.79	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.80	19.99	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.80	35/109
agentless	20.47	19.20	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.27	19.59	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.88	31/106
agentlessCodeCoverage	22.71	22.99	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.28	22.54	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.17	32/107
agentlessLineCoverage	40.47	38.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.80	38.67	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.80	31/108

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - sonar-java

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	2.95	19.20	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -16.25	13.94	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -10.99	33/122
agentless	-5.55	11.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -17.20	11.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -17.20	31/120
agentlessCodeCoverage	60.76	77.88	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -17.12	74.82	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -14.06	31/120
agentlessLineCoverage	127.84	125.85	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +1.99	113.88	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +13.96	33/120

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - pass4s

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	-15.18	8.98	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -24.16	9.92	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -25.10	28/100
agentless	-16.57	7.65	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -24.22	9.35	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -25.92	28/100
agentlessCodeCoverage	-9.40	14.23	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -23.63	15.72	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -25.12	27/94

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[cit-pr-commenter-54b7da]

CI Visibility Test Environment - spring_boot

Job Status: 🟢 success

Scenario	This PR (%)	7d median	Δ 7d	30d median	Δ 30d	runs (7d/30d)
agent	16.29	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	16.36	$\color{green}{\blacktriangledown}$ -0.07	31/108
agentless	10.56	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.64	9.92	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.64	31/106
agentlessCodeCoverage	13.44	13.40	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.04	13.40	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.04	31/106
agentlessLineCoverage	22.36	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.27	22.09	$\color{red}{\blacktriangle}$ +0.27	33/108

Baseline: median of @test.tracer_overhead on main (gitlab) over the last 7/30 days, per OSS project & scenario. Δ = this PR − baseline median; red ▲ = more overhead, green ▽ = less overhead than baseline.

Tests run to verify that CI Visibility behavior has not regressed in the current PR.

[AlexeyKuznetsov-DD]

/code blockers

[gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351]

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-21 12:51:13 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /code blockers

---

2026-09-21 12:51:14 UTC ℹ️ Devflow:

Checking merge blockers for #12572...

---

2026-09-21 12:51:23 UTC ℹ️ Devflow: /code blockers

Detected 2 merge blocker(s) to address:

🟠 Pending

• Required check dd-gitlab/default-pipeline is running

• Merge gate rule reviewers-approval is running: 1 approval missing
  All required reviewers must approve this pull request before it can be merged. Learn more in our FAQ.

  • Needs approval from Team: apm-lang-platform-java

  Hint: Questions about this check? Reach out in #dx-source-code-management on Slack.

[bric3]

LGTM, but I'd like one tiny fix.

[AlexeyKuznetsov-DD]

/merge

[gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351]

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-21 17:12:32 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

---

2026-09-21 17:12:37 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).

---

2026-09-21 18:25:21 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged