Conversation
|
@Neves-P Can you clarify why you're closing this? |
|
@boegel sorry about that! That was unintentional, I accidentally deleted the wrong branch on my fork! |
|
I don't get why |
|
Now I am indeed closing this one in favor of #282. Both approaches work and are backwards compatible with the existing workflow, so that merging them won't break anything. @bedroge's approach, however, already accommodates custom installation prefixes without requiring that the installation subdir variable is passed all the way through the software layer, and bot build and ingestion code. Let's go with #282 instead, otherwise we delay this for longer. However, the aim of leveraging a custom installation prefix for |
With this PR we are in the last (?) steps to generalize support for custom installation prefixes, following from EESSI/software-layer-scripts#239 and EESSI/software-layer-scripts#295
This is still a draft, as the verions subpath argument must still be obtained from the tarball metadata. This is currently not encoded anywhere we can easily gather at the ingestion stage.
versions, preserving standard repository behavior.dev.eessi.io-specific filename inference../..path components.software.eessi.io/versionswhen falling back.