Conversation
Four comments in the Cortex-R52 module port explained what the Cortex-M ports do instead. A reader working on this port cannot act on any of it: the behaviour described belongs to a different architecture, and the surrounding comments already say what this port does and why. The remaining text is unchanged. The abort vector still explains the three things it owes the fault handler and what omitting the first costs, the fault handler still explains why its two statements are ordered as they are, and the preamble still says that every GNU module port writes the entry-point words the same way. Comment-only. The port builds clean, 203 targets, zero warnings. Assisted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Sep 28, 2026
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Four comments in the Cortex-R52 module port explained what the Cortex-M ports do instead of what this port does. A reader working on this port cannot act on any of it: the behaviour described belongs to a different architecture, and the surrounding comments already say what this port does and why.
The remaining text is unchanged. The abort vector still explains the three things it owes the fault handler and what omitting the first costs, the fault handler still explains why its two statements are ordered as they are, and the preamble still records that every GNU module port writes the entry-point words the same way.
The same two passages appear in the ThreadX Modules manual and are removed there in rtos-docs-asciidoc.
Comment-only. The port builds clean at 203 targets with zero warnings.