Repository navigation
chore: version packages - #321
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@haverstack/conformance-fixtures@0.31.0
Minor Changes
#320
f99ab6bThanks @cuibonobo! - Pin the grantee arms and the evaluation-time refusals that the fixtures only described.Two fixtures covered a grant with no grantee at all and a group arm with no role, and both said in prose that the other arms "are refused the same way" — a rule stated in a fixture and checked by nothing. Nine fixtures now stand behind it: each incomplete arm (
entitywith noentityId,groupwith nogroupId), an emptyentityIdas distinct from an absent one, the listing-onlyrole: 'any'that alistGrants()query may ask for and a stored grantee may never carry, an unrecognizedkind, and anullgrantee reported as the missing field it is rather than read as absent-then-defaulted.Two more pin the half of the rule no request shape can show: that a grant reaching storage unvetted confers nothing when it is read back. A grant naming
_app@1still answers 403 on a create, and a mutate verb with no read companion in the same grant conveys neither the write nor a read — so it answers 404, not 403. Both are statesgrant()refuses and a server mapping a request body, an import, or a foreign server's response can still produce.Also pins that an
anyoneelement labelled anything butreadis refused, which is load-bearing beyond the element: stored, it would read as world read and satisfy thereadawriteelement needs beside it, silencing write-implies-read for every grantee on the record.No behavior change — every rule here is already in
docs/spec/access-control.md. A consumer holding these fixtures to a coverage gate will see the new names and need to dispatch or skip them.