You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some use cases, waiting for actions to complete does not make sens, for example deleting a server can be done in a fire and forget manner to prevent waiting too long the resource are deleted.
We proposed users to put the process in the background to continue with their scripts, but this can lead to multiple problems:
We do not have the information if the actions that we created, was actually created without error.
We have inconsistent behavior when deleting resources in batches, the first 10 will have the expected behavior, but the rest of the resources will still have to wait for the first batch to complete.
i would really like to see that. i currently changing the type of server and hcloud is doing that for nearly two hours also the gui shows that the process is initiated and at 80%. would be nice to have the possibility to just let hcloud call the api and return to shell. maybe add a new poll command to check the status.
Activity
[-]Allow not waiting for actions[/-][+]feat: allow not waiting for actions[/+]github-actions commentedon Nov 29, 2024
This issue has been marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. The bot will close the issue if no further action occurs.
c33s commentedon May 14, 2026
i would really like to see that. i currently changing the type of server and hcloud is doing that for nearly two hours also the gui shows that the process is initiated and at 80%. would be nice to have the possibility to just let hcloud call the api and return to shell. maybe add a new poll command to check the status.