Skip to content

fix(deps): alias image-size to image-size-next@1.2.2 (CVE-2025-71329/71330) - #24

Open
lcf2212dev wants to merge 1 commit into
isleofcode:masterfrom
lcf2212dev:fix/image-size-next-1.2.2
Open

lcf2212dev wants to merge 1 commit into
isleofcode:masterfrom
lcf2212dev:fix/image-size-next-1.2.2

Conversation

@lcf2212dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Why this PR

splicon generates app icon sets. Default master lists image-size@0.3.5 as a devDependency (0.x → 1.x pin) so tests can assert the source icon's width/height before splicing densities.

Published splicon@0.0.15 still depends on image-size@0.3.5 (devDependencies). Upstream image-size is archived. That coordinate remains affected by:

There is no patched release on the original package name. npm audit fix cannot rename the coordinate. This is a follow-up to #23 with a one-line alias so installs stop fetching the vulnerable tarball.

Change

Alias the published 1.x devDependency in package.json:

- "image-size": "0.3.5"
+ "image-size": "npm:image-size-next@1.2.2"

Call sites left untouched:

  • node-tests/unit/splash-task-test.js:8 const sizeOf = require('image-size');
  • node-tests/unit/icon-task-test.js:8 const sizeOf = require('image-size');
  • node-tests/unit/utils/write-images-test.js:8 const sizeOf = require('image-size');

image-size-next@1.2.2 is a MIT community fork with the same 1.x public API. Compare: lcf2212dev/image-size-next@v1.2.1...v1.2.2

This is the 1.x pin (CJS default-export require('image-size') / import sizeOf from 'image-size' (0.x/1.x). Do not use image-size-next@2.1.1 here (ESM+CJS 2.x named imageSize export).)

Hub: lcf2212dev/image-size-next#3

I maintain image-size-next and am not affiliated with the original image-size author, nor with this project. Happy to drop the alias if you prefer vendoring the size helper.

Test plan

  • install resolves image-sizeimage-size-next@1.2.2
  • existing require/import of image-size needs no source edits
  • image width/height behaviour on the call sites above is unchanged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant