You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Authorization request: AI-assisted contributions from @arhxam #1085
run regression tests, linters, and build checks locally;
push branches and open pull requests under @arhxam;
monitor CI and respond to review feedback on those pull requests.
It will not merge pull requests, approve/review other contributors' work, mass-comment on issues, or automatically create speculative issues. Pull requests will disclose AI assistance and include the exact tests and validation performed.
Volume and safeguards
The immediate project is up to six useful, non-overlapping contributions. Before opening each pull request, I will check for an existing or competing fix, use a regression-first workflow for behavior changes, and keep each change narrowly scoped. I understand the repository's finite review capacity and the current discussion in #1084; I will follow any lower limit or sequencing requested by collaborators.
Please let me know whether this workflow is authorized, or what constraints I should apply before publishing contributions.
Refrain from opening new Pull Requests before the first one has been approved.
This gives others the first impression that you are flooding the project.
Activity
trivikr commentedon Aug 10, 2026
Hi @arhxam, please read the AI-guidelines in PR nodejs/node#62105
It's approved by multiple collaborators and is expected to be merged soon.
aduh95 commentedon Aug 10, 2026
In the last 10 hours, you have opened 12 PRs:
Your use of LLMs could be used as an example of how not to contribute to open-source
trivikr commentedon Aug 10, 2026
As Antoine mentioned, spamming open source projects with AI contributions should be avoided.
It's explicitly called out in the docs