You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
🟢 R43 — session session_01YSygzqVmrY31BnZge8KDo6, seat repo:cloud#1, assignee/linked user os-zhuang (as GET /user answers it). Seated on the maintainer's summon /pm-dispatch cloud. The opening marker is 5906435762. Patrol: self-bound Routine trig_011Euvsj5P3muxpqvF2eP5oD (hourly at :33). Batch size 3. Refreshed at the R43 round boundary, 2026-09-30 about 14:35Z.
⚠️os-zhuang is one of the two approver accounts, and it is also this container's credential. It is used only as assignee. Writes go through the fleet relay, and this seat never reviews or approves. The maintainer has been told.
⛔ Blocker (maintainer only): cloud GitHub Actions has been refused account-wide since about 14:05Z. The annotation reads "recent account payments have failed or your spending limit needs to be increased". No CI, merge-queue run or staging deploy can start until an org owner clears it under Billing & plans. objectstack's Actions are unaffected.
Landed this round (merged, verified on main, cards closed by hand):
⛔ Nothing in this section is inherited prose. R37's ledger (2026-09-07T06:4xZ) and the consolidation seat's restatement of it are both retired here: every line below is a reading taken at takeover, and the five items the two briefs handed forward were re-read one by one and are listed under Retired inheritance.
⚠️ State-machine breakages visible at takeover (to verify before repair, ⛔ not to be repaired blind)
The six states (pm:queue · pm:dispatched · pm:blocked · pm:on-hold · pm:awaiting-maintainer · needs-user-decision) are mutually exclusive, and finding means awaiting first triage — triage removes it. Five rows break that, and R37's warning about #2135 still stands verbatim: ⛔ do not guess which half is right; read the card and its comments first, and when in doubt treat it as awaiting a ruling, because mis-dispatching a card that is waiting on a ruling costs more than dispatching a ruled card late.
⛔ All eleven were worked in wave R38-1; none was looked at and put back. Five are closed and nothing is in flight; every card still open carries a published reading and a named owner.
⛔ not dispatchable as written — its headline premise is falsified and it needs one re-shaping pass (5683756690)
Closed this wave: #13272 · #15861 · #16852 · #17233 · #17045. Filed this wave: #18304 (agent.tools re-grade, triage's) · #18309 (CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES, both directions) · #18314 (a gate script unrunnable from an agent container). #13272 landed — PR #18313 merged 2026-09-15T16:49:13Z as 863c7c44; verified on main (21 stamps present, agent.tools still unstamped with status: live), pm:dispatched + assignee stripped by hand with the read-back, status returned to the domain:spec seat (5684343147).
Unblocked elsewhere: #15858 (domain:cli, pm:blocked) — its blocker was a reading this seat could take; delivered as 5683116026. ⛔ Its label transition is that seat's.
Retired inheritance — the five items both briefs handed forward, each re-read 2026-09-15T15:06:16Z
awaiting a human merge: PR #2028 → cloud#1962, with R37's D5 point owed
PR merged 2026-09-07T07:45:27Z; #1962closed completed 07:45:28Z. ⚠️ The merged PR still carries needs-user-decision. ⛔ Whether D5's second paragraph was removed before the merge is not verified here and is not claimed either way
serial queue on packages/service-cloud/src/routes/package-install.ts, holder + 2 queued
queue retired: cloud#2003 closed completed 2026-09-07T08:39:22Z, objectstack#14034 closed completed 2026-09-07T12:00:13Z, and the holding branch's card is closed
⚠️not a current reading — #2118 and #2092 now sit in pm:queue, #2135 in pm:blocked+pm:epic, and #1994 is not open at all. The live decision box is the needs-user-decision bucket above
both still open in pm:queue. ⭐ R37's ordering constraint on #2127 — framework first, cloud never first, or artifact-kernel-factory.ts degrades to 'unnamed-app' and crashes the environment kernel at package install — is a ruling, ⛔ not re-litigable in-seat
【R37】apps/objectos 的 test = preflight && vitest run,而 test:crm-bundle / test:boot-smoke 等是 tsx 脚本,vitest 不收集它们。 CI 只跑 boot-smoke + cloud#1650 提升的三个 tsx 门(production-flow / billing-flow / cloud-app);test:crm-bundle无人跑。test.yml 自己的注释已记过同类:「it is test:boot-smoke, not test, which is how it sat red for three weeks unnoticed」。⇒ 事实 24 的活体实例,查「这个测试真的在跑吗」。
⛔ Platform facts added by R38 (English from here down; 存量中文事实 1–44 above are 不追溯改写)
REST is OPEN to BOTH repos from this seat's container, probed 2026-09-15T15:02:53Z: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud/issues → 200, GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/6026 → 200, /rate_limit → core 15000/h (the App-install bucket, so not the MCP user bucket). ⇒ The vacancy reason this post's title carried for six days — "repo not attached" — was an attribute of that session, not of this lane. ⛔ Never inherit a reachability verdict from another session; probe once per session, and ⛔ 仓不可达 is never "checked and clean".
Both container checkouts are shallow, 50 commits each — /home/user/cloud at cb8ee7ff and /home/user/objectstack at 827cacbf, read 2026-09-15T15:08:47Z. Platform fact 39 (shallow clones answer merge-base and windowed git log wrongly at exit 0) therefore applies to both repos now, not just objectstack. Deepen (git fetch --deepen=3000) or go through REST compare before any ancestry claim.
create_trigger warns "this trigger stores no MCP connectors" even for a self-bound timer, and for that shape the warning is not a defect: a self-bound firing resumes THIS session, with this session's tools. It is exactly the silent-zero-output failure seat-post-protocol.md names only for a fresh-session Routine. ⛔ Do not read the warning as "the timer is broken", and ⛔ do not read a created id as an armed timer either — read it back.
PUT .../pulls/{n}/ccr/auto_merge IGNORES merge_method. Measured both spellings on PR fix(spec): the 21 confirmed cloud citations in the agent/skill/action liveness ledgers carry a read date and a symbol anchor #18313 at 2026-09-15T16:31:00Z: {"merge_method":"SQUASH"} and {"merge_method":"squash"} each return 200 echoing "merge_method":"merge", and the PR's stored auto_merge.merge_method reads back merge. rest-channel.md documents the SQUASH payload; that value does not stick. ⚠️ Harmless here — the merge QUEUE decides the method, allow_merge_commit is false and origin/main's first-parent history is linear — but ⛔ never read that echo as confirmation that a method was set.
An aggregator job reports FAILURE when its lanes were CANCELLED by a superseding push.TypeScript Type Check and Test Core run no compiler and no test: each reads the jobs named in OS_AGGREGATOR_MEMBERS and fails if any did not conclude success. Measured three times this wave. ⇒ A red aggregator on a superseded head is a supersede artifact, ⛔ not a gate finding — read the members per shard before diagnosing. On 97b17e9e, Test Core (4/6) succeeded and the other five were cancelled; no shard failed at all, yet two checks read failure.
A PR body PATCH re-triggers the PR-metadata gates (Check Changeset, The card this PR closes must claim this branch, Part-of PR must not also close its card, No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path). Budget a body edit like a push, and ⛔ do not spend one late in a run to add a sentence.
⭐ Two pushes to one PR cost two supersede cascades. This seat sent a dev two follow-ups (anchors, then notes) instead of one batch; each push cancelled an in-flight run and produced a red aggregator on the head it superseded. ⇒ Batch every correction from one review pass into ONE follow-up.
⛔ Platform facts added by R39 — every one measured this round
本贴是
repo:cloud(整仓)座位的唯一权威登记。 座位贴协议(维护者 2026-08-06 批准):索引 =label:pm:seat,总入口 #4604。单写手规则:只有在任座位 PM 编辑正文;接管/移交 = 改正文 + 审计评论;动手前重拉正文、时间戳先到先得、写后回读。当前 PM
🟢 R43 — session
session_01YSygzqVmrY31BnZge8KDo6, seatrepo:cloud#1, assignee/linked useros-zhuang(asGET /useranswers it). Seated on the maintainer's summon/pm-dispatch cloud. The opening marker is 5906435762. Patrol: self-bound Routinetrig_011Euvsj5P3muxpqvF2eP5oD(hourly at :33). Batch size 3. Refreshed at the R43 round boundary, 2026-09-30 about 14:35Z.os-zhuangis one of the two approver accounts, and it is also this container's credential. It is used only as assignee. Writes go through the fleet relay, and this seat never reviews or approves. The maintainer has been told.⛔ Blocker (maintainer only): cloud GitHub Actions has been refused account-wide since about 14:05Z. The annotation reads "recent account payments have failed or your spending limit needs to be increased". No CI, merge-queue run or staging deploy can start until an org owner clears it under Billing & plans. objectstack's Actions are unaffected.
Landed this round (merged, verified on
main, cards closed by hand):4b4ee88f)ff673b5b65befb3253fbf81fb94a29471bf61d27e27cc53d59f0542bba914e92pm:awaiting-maintainer(one read-only SQL reading)ACCEPTed, and waiting only for Actions to run again:
mainuntil it lands. It touches.github/workflows, so the maintainer may have to enqueue it by hand.Decision box (maintainer):
pm:on-hold: docs(skill): teach the automation skill the ADR-0044 send-back-for-revision shape #2294 wakes on the first scheduled patrol run after 14:05Z; itsRestart-when:line is on the card.Director hand-off 5912560798:
pm:queuefor this seat. It also carries the stale-docblock line from feat(spec): spec↔frontend conformance check for react blocks (+ first audit) #2480.Filed this round: objectstack#20861, Design: application builder UI — remaining pillars (Automation / Interface / Access / Settings) #2506, chore: version packages #2509.
Seat errors, recorded:
Tool note:
issue-create.mjsreturned UNCONFIRMED (exit 6) three times this session, for Design: application builder UI — remaining pillars (Automation / Interface / Access / Settings) #2506, chore: version packages #2509 and one earlier card. Each time the card had been created exactly once, as the board read confirmed.In flight and claims: the live record is the
Claim:comments on the cards. This section is refreshed only at round boundaries.✅ harness 面 —— R41 本会话实测 CURRENT,四个面全中(⛔ R40 那张表已退役)
/home/user/objectstack,HEADd8b12fca97)。git fetch origin main后本检出落后origin/main(f347c79)一个提交,而该提交不触碰任何 harness 面。check-harness-current.mjs(按事实 52 从origin/main取当前版本,连同scripts/invoked-as.mjs与整个scripts/pm/落 scratchpad 后跑,⛔ 不是共享检出里那一份)整句读数:.claude/settings.jsonb3e437db2(origin/main逐字相同.claude/hooks/*b3e437db2(.claude/agents/*.mdb3e437db2(.claude/skills/**6427ee2480(proven:父提交在册,diff-tree逐文件列出)b3e437db2」是浅 clone 的嫁接边界 —— 它的父提交f9a9e76fe不在本检出里,git 于是拿它与空树比,于是该提交树里每一个路径都读成「在这里被触碰」。⇒ 那三行的 sha ⛔ 不是「这一提交改了这个文件」的证据(事实 39/46 在 harness 读数上的同一张脸)。作准的是每面第二行的内容比对= HEAD content is identical to origin/main—— 它按内容判,与嫁接无关,而四面全部为真。⛔ 不要把嫁接边界当触碰读数往外引。三章程文件的最新触碰 sha(
git log -1 origin/main -- <path>,本次取数):SKILL.md与references/core-rules.md同为6427ee2(2026-09-18T01:15:42Z,同一提交)—— 与 R40 读到的一致;两份均已在本会话读过。⭐ harness CURRENT 与「我能不能派 dev」是两件事(R40 的实测,原样保留):后者只取决于容器启动那一刻仓在不在盘上,只有一次探针能回答。本会话两件各自量过,都通过。
⛔
references/lanes/cloud.md仍不存在:git ls-tree origin/main复核,references/lanes/下只有 cli · devx · director · engine · hotcrm · services · skills · spec · triage · ui 十个。⇒ 本席的岗位说明只活在本贴的 范围 与 说明 两节,未按章程版本化到references/lanes/。⛔ 席内不自行补写(references/**是domain:skills车道的受管面),第四次记录在此供换班报告采信。范围
cloud 全仓队列 + objectstack 上带
repo:cloud的缝卡。执行座位 + 单车道机械三务自理;⛔ 不产domain:*。⛔ 每轮两仓都读。继承台账
⛔ Nothing in this section is inherited prose. R37's ledger (2026-09-07T06:4xZ) and the consolidation seat's restatement of it are both retired here: every line below is a reading taken at takeover, and the five items the two briefs handed forward were re-read one by one and are listed under Retired inheritance.
pm:queue42 ·pm:dispatched2 ·pm:blocked16 ·pm:on-hold11 ·pm:awaiting-maintainer18 ·needs-user-decision0 ·pm:retriage0。一班之内 41 张卡换了状态，⛔ 不要拿下表当盘点。cloud board — R41 重取(2026-09-20T14:14Z,⛔ 09-18T16:12Z 那张表已退役)
pm:queuepm:dispatchedpm:blockedpm:awaiting-maintainerpm:on-holdneeds-user-decisionpm:blocking,自 2026-09-18T23:45Z 未动),它压着 pin bump #2336,而 #2336 自己也是pm:blockingpm:epic·priority:p0pm:retriage·findingobjectstack 上带
repo:cloud的缝卡 3 张 open,同刻读:#17148(priority:p2)· objectstack-ai/cloud#2521(priority:p3)· #17693(无优先级)—— 三张的created_at都在 09-09…09-11,⛔ 本轮无新增。另两张 #16084 与 #17072 已由本席本轮落地并关闭(89791f05/dae1be3d,各自一父验过)。在飞 dev 0。⭐ 本轮盘面上最大的一件事:决策箱被总监席整箱清空(9 → 0),队列随之从 29 涨到 38。 九条裁决的执行段本席逐条读过,四条与本席相关的约束记在这里,⛔ 不要从卡号自行推断:
pm:blocked,阻塞者是 pin bump;Blocked-by:行(只有提案里的一句散文),本席已按裁决原文补上Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#2332+Unlock-action:,并写明解锁要读 pin 侧判据、⛔ 不是只看卡号关没关。R41 本轮台账
合计 —— REST 实测,2026-09-20T14:14Z(⛔ 下面四段 09-18T16:12Z 的明细保留作历史,不是现值)
本轮关卡 42 张:cloud 40 张(1876 1977 1997 1999 2041 2174 2262 2271 2272 2281 2283 2289 2297 2309 2322 2324 2326 2328 2333 2334 2338 2339 2342 2344 2345 2348 2352 2354 2356 2359 2361 2365 2366 2374 2382 2388 2389 2391 2392 2394)+ objectstack 缝卡 2 张(#16084 · #17072)。同期 cloud 合入 PR 41 个(#2357…#2421;取数窗口回溯到 2026-09-12,⛔ 不是被 100 条分页截断的下界)+ objectstack 侧两个(
89791f05·dae1be3d)。本轮新立 cloud 卡 17 张(2359 2361 2365 2366 2367 2369 2370 2372 2374 2377 2382 2388 2389 2391 2392 2394 2396)+ 上游 objectui#9954。09-18T16:12Z 的明细(历史)
落地 5 张:#1977(棘轮改为量运行时真正发出的前缀;⛔ 人工地板守住,ceiling 一字没抬;真实余量 94 字符不是 688)· #2272(不存在的桶启动时响亮报出,凭据脱敏与功能同笔落)· #2174(退役 cloud#2069 迁移;⭐ 退役单位是 9 个文件不是 1 个,
check:migration-has-invoker的定义就是权威)· #2354(extend 模式两张推断表 + gantt 降级披露)· #2348(stream_chat写ai_traces;⭐ 连带退役了从来没有任何东西能发出的embedoperation)。新立 6 张:#2359(决策卡,已裁 N 并关闭 —— 探测停在日志,⛔ 不建部署门/容器侧端点/Worker 里的 SigV4;留具名再触发)· #2361(
restore_environment不发信号 ⇒ 恢复后仍答归档 409 页)· #2365(NEW 模式 gantt 降级无人披露;复现已在树里,把一条不变量断言反过来即可)· #2366(composed-artifact-agents的cloud#1453块吃 5000ms 默认值而兄弟块写了 60_000)· #2369(空pricing对象把每次调用算成恰好 0 且不打cost_unpriced)· #2370((c) 类,Blocked-by: objectstack-ai/objectstack#2337—— graph-lint 告诉作者模型时钟触发器是 best-effort,抬 pin 后它们根本不会被武装)。转态 3 张:#2172 →⚠️ 继承的简报说该卡由 #1999 的裁决同笔放回,而裁决执行段原话是 「cloud#2352 is untouched.」 ⇒ 本席按卡自己的判据动,不按继承的句子)· #2021 补
pm:blocked(⭐ pin 不覆盖:build-progress.zod.ts在main上 200、在 pinbdea10a1上 404,阳性对照agent.zod.ts两边都 200;⛔ 解锁判据写成「在新 pin 上重读那条路径」而不是「#2332 关了」)· #2352 →pm:queue(它自己写死的判据「#1999 离开needs-user-decision」已命中;Blocked-by: objectui#9868(原文只有散文描述)。释放 1 张:#2337 —— dev 一行代码未写即停在停手条款上,而理由经本席复核成立:上游开关是零参数、活读 env 的全局函数(
resolveScheduledWorkEnabled(): boolean/resolveScheduledWorkPolicy(): ScheduledWorkPolicy),五个消费者全部零参数调用,而托管运行时是一个进程装最多 50 个混合档位内核(OS_KERNEL_CACHE_SIZE: '50')⇒ 逐环境的值无处可放。⛔ 裁决方向未动,不可执行的是「在 cloud 的一个接线点上做」这句机制。卡已带四棱块回箱等 ①/②/③/④。⛔ 开着的 8 个 PR —— 全是 draft,没有一个是本席能合或能入队的(2026-09-20T14:14Z 逐个实测)
pm:blocking)dirty463da19amain一天动好几次。只说过一次(5749009833),⛔ 不重复cleancleandocs/adr/**)cleanAGENTS.md)cleancleancleancleanPart of objectstack-ai/objectstack#2346⇒ 合并后 ⛔ 不会自关,要手工关卡(先摘pm:dispatched+ assignee,再逐字段 PATCHstate,再重 GET)⭐ 治理面 PR 的「人工合并」本身就是复核记录(一条命中即整 PR 分叉),⛔ 席位不翻 ready、不入队、不挂 auto-merge。cloud 的四行治理面:
AGENTS.md·CLAUDE.md·.claude/**·docs/adr/**。[finding]+Bug,派发时没有裁决,也不欠裁决(文档与实测代码矛盾是缺陷,不是决定)。本席 2026-09-20T13:1x 已各补一条说明把这一点写在卡上,免得后来人把「判过不需要」读成「漏了一次裁决」:5750011261/5750011378/5750011503。两条各等一件只有维护者能做的事(原文保留)
clean、仍 draft。裁决5696429518要求落地 PR 陈述「当前suspended环境计数」与「其中是否有任何一个在被暂停后仍服务过流量」——本席与 dev 各自实测都够不到生产面(阳性对照:生产 host 传输失败而同一客户端读api.github.com得 200)。零 ⇒ 原样入队;非零且有流量 ⇒ 是破坏性变更、需通知窗口,那是新决定,⛔ 不是回退到 B 的许可。clean、仍 draft,且这是刻意的 ——docs/adr/**在 diff 里 ⇒「混合 diff 一条命中即整 PR 分叉」⇒ 受管落地,⛔ 席位不翻 ready、不入队、不挂 auto-merge。⭐ 它顺带查出:价目表从一个没有任何部署会传的 option 播种 ⇒ 全舰队注册表一直是空的。缺的 luna 费率是后续数据行,⛔ 不扣住合并。The six states (
pm:queue·pm:dispatched·pm:blocked·pm:on-hold·pm:awaiting-maintainer·needs-user-decision) are mutually exclusive, andfindingmeans awaiting first triage — triage removes it. Five rows break that, and R37's warning about #2135 still stands verbatim: ⛔ do not guess which half is right; read the card and its comments first, and when in doubt treat it as awaiting a ruling, because mis-dispatching a card that is waiting on a ruling costs more than dispatching a ruled card late.needs-user-decision+pm:queue: fix(setup): first-run admin polish — nav pin, widget service-gate, i18n, settings PUT envelope #2249pm:blocked+pm:epic: docs(ui): drill 'Open in list' escape hatch + unified report drill #2135 (the card R37 named; the pair has changed shape since, it readpm:queue+needs-user-decisionthen)finding+ a pm state: ci(release): pre-publish backward-compat smoke against live hotcrm (#2035) #2093, fix(examples): typecheck example apps clean + gate in CI #2023 (pm:on-hold), docs(adr): ADR-0053 — Phase 2 detailed design (reference-timezone model) #1975 (pm:blocked)pm:donewhile still open: chore(spec): refresh api-surface snapshot for aggregation-policy exports (#2208 follow-up) #2209, fix(release): push version tags in one atomic push (avoid commit_refs race) #2195 — both P0 credential-leak cards, both assignedhotlong. ⛔pm:doneis not one of the six; whether it is a legitimate closing marker in this repo or a half-state is a reading this seat owes.pm:dispatchedwith no assignee: fix(setup): drop Advanced nav entries for non-listable objects (verifications, device codes) #2266, chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 17 updates #2158, fix(runtime): surface code-defined datasources on the host-config boot path (ADR-0015 §18) #2157 — dispatched by someone between R37's stand-down and now. ⛔ Not this seat's to touch until the claim comments say whose they are; a card with a live claim belongs to its claimant.objectstack seam cards carrying⚠️ 现为 3 open(2026-09-20T14:14Z 重数;下表是坐席那一刻的 5 张,⛔ 其中 #16084 与 #17072 已由本席落地关闭)
repo:cloud—closed / completed(本次逐张读,标签仍是priority:p2·repo:cloud·domain:spec)⇒ 它已离表,下面只剩 5 张。其余五张的读数是 R38 那一波的,⛔ 派发或转态前逐张重读。⛔ All eleven were worked in wave R38-1; none was looked at and put back. Five are closed and nothing is in flight; every card still open carries a published reading and a named owner.
pm:queue69602e578(ahead_by 716 / behind_by 0).5683648332)pm:queue5683255225)pm:queue5683230070); the three-way choice is thedomain:engineseat'spm:queue5683694154); the reduction itself is thedomain:skillslane'spm:queue5683756690)Closed this wave: #13272 · #15861 · #16852 · #17233 · #17045. Filed this wave: #18304 (
agent.toolsre-grade, triage's) · #18309 (CLOUD_PROVIDED_OBJECT_NAMES, both directions) · #18314 (a gate script unrunnable from an agent container). #13272 landed — PR #18313 merged 2026-09-15T16:49:13Z as863c7c44; verified onmain(21 stamps present,agent.toolsstill unstamped withstatus: live),pm:dispatched+ assignee stripped by hand with the read-back, status returned to thedomain:specseat (5684343147).Unblocked elsewhere: #15858 (
domain:cli,pm:blocked) — its blocker was a reading this seat could take; delivered as5683116026. ⛔ Its label transition is that seat's.Retired inheritance — the five items both briefs handed forward, each re-read 2026-09-15T15:06:16Z
needs-user-decision. ⛔ Whether D5's second paragraph was removed before the merge is not verified here and is not claimed either waypackages/service-cloud/src/routes/package-install.ts, holder + 2 queuedpm:queue, #2135 inpm:blocked+pm:epic, and #1994 is not open at all. The live decision box is theneeds-user-decisionbucket abovepm:queue. ⭐ R37's ordering constraint on #2127 — framework first, cloud never first, orartifact-kernel-factory.tsdegrades to'unnamed-app'and crashes the environment kernel at package install — is a ruling, ⛔ not re-litigable in-seat热文件串行队
None declared —— 2026-09-18T09:36Z 复核后退役。 R39 中途（评论
5722063008）在packages/service-ai/src/tools/visualize-data.tool.ts上声明过一条队：1. cloud#2092 → 2. cloud#2093。本次逐张读回：两张都已closed / completed（#2093 以6a0ff9e0落地），队列的两端都没了。⇒ 队退役。同笔复核了那条评论里的另外两张在飞卡：cloud#2023 已 closed completed；cloud#2179 仍 open，现为
pm:blocked+pm:blocking、无 assignee，⛔ 已不在飞。⇒ 本贴写下这一刻，本车道在飞 dev 为 0。下一任若发现两张 open 卡共用一个热文件，在此声明：文件 → 有序卡号 → 每张卡认领的区域。
说明
⛔ 本仓平台事实(接管者先读;【R37】为本班实测)
enable_pr_auto_merge才是进队动作,唯一可靠读数 =event: merge_grouprun。队列按顺序逐个合。<sha>/<path>存活。RouteDefinition.permissions零消费。dispatch-gates.mjs、无仓级 lint ⇒ 门禁按 diff 从check:*+test.yml推导。add_repo;objectui 不可写 ⇒ 缝卡。/search/issues403。ObjectLogger是类。config开放 record;flow.zod.ts≠job.zod.tsid 空间。updated_at不是活性信号,读 job steps。list_pull_requests.merged不可信;认merged_at+closed。packages/service-ai-studio/src/skills/不是 governed 面。pnpm --filter PKG typecheck test把test当参数 ⇒ 分两条命令。curl raw.githubusercontent.com/...。JobSchedule文件头自证事实 16。list_triggers;送达延迟 0–14 分钟常见。【R37 复现:本班 MCP 掉线一次,重连后继续,无状态损失】Part of不保证不关卡 ⇒ 合并后 close-verify 一律读 state。git merge-tree对 add/add 与内容冲突报 0。 一律git merge-tree --write-tree --name-only <A> <B>。createRequire到dist/index.cjs、静态 import 到dist/index.js= 两份模块实例。find一次。closed_by_pull_requests是最早信号。disable_pr_auto_merge不出队;代理禁 ref 删除。/home/user/objectstack是浅 clone(55 commits)。 窗口化git log/merge-base在它上面以 exit 0 无警告答错 —— 本班就先拿到过一个假的「未找到」。pin 祖先判定必须先git fetch --deepen=3000(只加对象,不动 HEAD/工作树,安全)或走 RESTcompare。⛔ 浅检出上的merge-base不是 pin 读数。apps/objectos的test=preflight && vitest run,而test:crm-bundle/test:boot-smoke等是tsx脚本,vitest 不收集它们。 CI 只跑 boot-smoke + cloud#1650 提升的三个 tsx 门(production-flow / billing-flow / cloud-app);test:crm-bundle无人跑。test.yml自己的注释已记过同类:「it istest:boot-smoke, nottest, which is how it sat red for three weeks unnoticed」。⇒ 事实 24 的活体实例,查「这个测试真的在跑吗」。priority:p1标签(只有priority:p0)。⛔ 不要凭记忆挂,严重度写进评论正文。claude[bot],不是席位账号 ⇒ 对os-zhuang请审不会触发 author-identity 422,两个授权账号都能正常请审(本班实测两个都进了requested_reviewers)。update_pull_request带reviewers时显式传draft: true能保住草稿位(回读确认draft仍为 true)。⛔ 仍要回读,不认 200。⛔ Platform facts added by R38 (English from here down; 存量中文事实 1–44 above are 不追溯改写)
REST is OPEN to BOTH repos from this seat's container, probed 2026-09-15T15:02:53Z:
GET /repos/objectstack-ai/cloud/issues→ 200,GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/6026→ 200,/rate_limit→ core 15000/h (the App-install bucket, so not the MCP user bucket). ⇒ The vacancy reason this post's title carried for six days — "repo not attached" — was an attribute of that session, not of this lane. ⛔ Never inherit a reachability verdict from another session; probe once per session, and ⛔ 仓不可达 is never "checked and clean".Both container checkouts are shallow, 50 commits each —
/home/user/cloudatcb8ee7ffand/home/user/objectstackat827cacbf, read 2026-09-15T15:08:47Z. Platform fact 39 (shallow clones answermerge-baseand windowedgit logwrongly at exit 0) therefore applies to both repos now, not just objectstack. Deepen (git fetch --deepen=3000) or go through RESTcomparebefore any ancestry claim.create_triggerwarns "this trigger stores no MCP connectors" even for a self-bound timer, and for that shape the warning is not a defect: a self-bound firing resumes THIS session, with this session's tools. It is exactly the silent-zero-output failureseat-post-protocol.mdnames only for a fresh-session Routine. ⛔ Do not read the warning as "the timer is broken", and ⛔ do not read a created id as an armed timer either — read it back.PUT .../pulls/{n}/ccr/auto_mergeIGNORESmerge_method. Measured both spellings on PR fix(spec): the 21 confirmed cloud citations in the agent/skill/action liveness ledgers carry a read date and a symbol anchor #18313 at 2026-09-15T16:31:00Z:{"merge_method":"SQUASH"}and{"merge_method":"squash"}each return200echoing"merge_method":"merge", and the PR's storedauto_merge.merge_methodreads backmerge.rest-channel.mddocuments theSQUASHpayload; that value does not stick.allow_merge_commitisfalseandorigin/main's first-parent history is linear — but ⛔ never read that echo as confirmation that a method was set.An aggregator job reports FAILURE when its lanes were CANCELLED by a superseding push.
TypeScript Type CheckandTest Corerun no compiler and no test: each reads the jobs named inOS_AGGREGATOR_MEMBERSand fails if any did not concludesuccess. Measured three times this wave. ⇒ A red aggregator on a superseded head is a supersede artifact, ⛔ not a gate finding — read the members per shard before diagnosing. On97b17e9e,Test Core (4/6)succeeded and the other five werecancelled; no shard failed at all, yet two checks readfailure.A PR body
PATCHre-triggers the PR-metadata gates (Check Changeset,The card this PR closes must claim this branch,Part-of PR must not also close its card,No other open PR may claim the same single-writer path). Budget a body edit like a push, and ⛔ do not spend one late in a run to add a sentence.⭐ Two pushes to one PR cost two supersede cascades. This seat sent a dev two follow-ups (anchors, then notes) instead of one batch; each push cancelled an in-flight run and produced a red aggregator on the head it superseded. ⇒ Batch every correction from one review pass into ONE follow-up.
⛔ Platform facts added by R39 — every one measured this round
origin/main的那一份。 R39 实测：/home/user/objectstack的 HEAD 落后origin/main293 个提交。用检出里那份check-half-states.mjs扫 cloud 得 20 行；把origin/main的同名脚本取出来扫同一块板得 70 行。⇒ 50 行本来看不见，而且旧仪器的一条 H44 还指错了评论。做法：git show origin/main:scripts/pm/<tool>.mjs连同scripts/invoked-as.mjs与整个scripts/pm/落到 scratchpad 再跑（⛔ 不改共享检出；PM 不写仓内文件）。--self-test会有 1 条 H43 失败并自陈原因（sibling-repo 副本不带 governed 名册），其余 4962 条通过。/\b\d{2}:\d{2}(?::\d{2})?Z\b/—— 它读不到本协议自己规定的分钟粒度写法…T09:30Z（T与紧随的数字之间没有\b），却能读到带秒的写法。origin/main早已修成(?:\b|(?<=T))。⇒ 与 cloud#2130 的「对照组是被测物的副本」、cloud#2356 的「假阳性落在对照组上」同族：仪器本身可能是坏的那一个，而它照常 exit 0。dispatch-gates.mjs --repo是断言，不是开关。 源码原话：「refuse unless this checkout IS that repo」，⛔ 它不会把推导指向另一个检出。⇒ cloud 的门禁名册仍须按 cloud 自己的package.json+.github/workflows/手工推导（本贴事实 6 仍然成立），但现在会响亮拒绝而不是给一个「完整、exit 0、完全错误」的答案。import同目录兄弟模块（如scripts/i18n-bundle-surface.mjs），scratchpad 副本要一并取。Claim:；## Claim这种标题形从来没被数进去过。 当前仪器把这类近失逐条列出：本板 4 条 —— chore(client): remove dead projects.* env-member SDK methods (ADR-0024 D9) #23325723350272、fix: single-tenant audit follow-ups — member/invitation org optional + headOf org-scope (ADR-0057) #21825723363219、chore: version packages #21795721976320皆为 heading-bare，feat(automation): screen-flow runtime — interactive screen nodes (suspend→render→resume) #14525356755552为 separator 形。⇒ 认领评论里Claim:与Branch:各自独占一行、行首起，⛔ 不要写成## Claim。PATCH /repos/{o}/{r}/issues/{n}经本代理必须显式带-H "Content-Type: application/json"，否则答 "Request bodies must declare Content-Type"。HALF_STATE_ANCHOR_ISSUE未设（维护者动作），所以每次定时跑都在Resolve the anchor步骤响亮失败，发现物留在 step summary 里没人读。⇒ 本席每轮的「先读巡查锚」只能靠自己跑那支脚本（按事实 52 的做法），⛔ 不能读作「锚是干净的」。同族：cloud#2294（变量）与 cloud#2295（副本落后 + governed 名册缺失导致 H43/H48 在本仓 NOT MEASURED）。MEASURED_MERGES_PER_DAY = 137.5/day（2026-08-23 钉）对实测 ~10.3/day（0.07×），MEASURED_CLOSED_ISSUE_UPDATES_PER_DAY = 139.4对 16.0（0.12×）。⇒ 它每一处「本窗口覆盖 N 天」的自述在本仓都按同样倍数说错。⛔ 常量住 objectstack，重钉是domain:skills车道的事，⛔ 本席不代改；读它的窗口自述时按倍数打折。⛔ Platform fact added by R40 — measured this round
source_url建出来的席位会话,mode:subagent整期是死的,且会话内修不好。 R40 实测:create_session未带source_url⇒ 容器启动时零仓 ⇒.claude/agents/os-dev.md不在盘上 ⇒ agent 名册里没有os-dev。Agent答Agent type os-dev not found. Available agents: claude, claude-code-guide, Explore, general-purpose, Plan, statusline-setup。把定义从origin/main逐字装到~/.claude/agents/与/home/user/.claude/agents/两处之后再探,答案一字不变 ⇒ 名册只在会话启动时建一次,⛔ 不重扫。对照:R39 的session_01TAUTP6Yky8QWoHUAPDKNJQ的session_context.sources是 objectstack · cloud · objectui(origin: desktop_app),它整轮派得动;R40 的是[](origin: claude_code_mcp_seed)。⇒ 建继任会话必须带source_url(objectstack —— 它才是.claude/agents/与全板工具链的住处);cloud 在会话内add_repo+ clone 即可。os-dev探针(要求回一个词就停)。⛔ 不要先认领再发现派不出去 —— R40 就是这么在 cloud#1977 上留下一个半状态的(已按Release:干净回滚,评论在卡上)。⛔ 长期禁令(跨任期)
不得设
OS_MCP_SERVER_ENABLED;⛔ 永不伪造 Origin / 设OS_TRUSTED_ORIGINS;⛔ 永不放宽 auth 断言;钉缺陷测试 promote never repair;⛔positions ?? roles回退禁;⛔ 永不编辑content/docs/releases/;governed 面 PR ⛔ 永不自行入队;⛔ 永不弱化 cloud#1265 守卫;⛔ 不删.changeset/*.md。⛔ Permanent notes(跨任期,判例)
卡面反事实也要实测;零命中必带阳性对照(R37 两次靠它拿到真读数:
/api/v1/environments/的真零,与浅 clone 的假零);dev 偏离更强则背书,但背书不等于照单全收;本席自己的判断过宽/过错就当场自更正(R37:Blocked-by前提证伪,已在 #2029 公开更正);hold 只认最近转换条件;停手条款是契约一部分;blocked 解锁 = 交付物在 ref 上,pin 消费的仓再加一问「pin 覆盖了吗」;设计卡 cloud 腿「designed blind」先复核;「enforce」实施前先找接缝;定级时核「spec 里没有」这类前提;门禁类修复的 CI 绿可能什么都不证明;声称「已裁决」缺出处三件即不采信;复核时决定性前提自己再测一遍(R37:ADR-0112 D6 第 99 行逐字核);「正确但靠手抄」是没钉住的缺陷(本仓已开三张同类:#1932 #1949 #1995);收紧前先找反向那一轴;翻 ready 前亲核首行,合并后仍读 state;已裁未执行的裁决,解锁时先执行再谈重判;维护者点名保留的面,⛔ 席内不得代认,哪怕 dev 的论据成立;epic 车道领地内的卡:定级是本席机械义务,派发是它的。迁移注记:本贴自 #4604 迁移(2026-08-06)。R36 于 09-04T07:5xZ 收尾空席;R37 于 09-07T05:41Z 坐席并在首个 wave 边界重写正文,新增平台事实 39–44。
R38 seated in the same stroke that rewrote §1–§3 under 接管压缩, and added platform facts 45–47.
R38 也补了 48–51。R39 于 2026-09-18T09:36Z 收班：重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、退役 R38 的盘点表、新增平台事实 52–58，并把决策箱补成 12/12 带卡面速读与四棱块。⛔ 本次未动「说明」下的既有事实 1–51 与两段禁令。
R40 于 2026-09-18T09:45Z 坐席（全新会话 + 全新检出）：重写「当前 PM」、把 R39 的 harness STALE 表换成本会话实测的 CURRENT 表、建自绑巡查 Routine
trig_01EbZZ6xCoceHtcJzx6EZgnK并记入正文，同笔记下references/lanes/cloud.md缺席这一缺口。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」「说明」四节的任何既有内容。R40 于 2026-09-18T10:00Z 收班:重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、新增平台事实 59、建好带
source_url的继任会话session_01WEsBsV9NHgypgTitazMHbe。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」与事实 1–58、两段禁令。R41 于 2026-09-18T10:14Z 坐席(带
source_url的新会话 + 全新检出,os-dev探针 ALIVE):重写「当前 PM」与 harness 两节、把盘点表与缝卡表换成本席同批的枚举、建自绑巡查 Routinetrig_015HUDAoCk6FW9G9SyaK4Wrf并记入正文。⛔ 本次未动「范围」「热文件串行队」「说明」三节与事实 1–59、两段禁令,也未动「继承台账」里 State-machine 破损表与 Retired inheritance 两块的既有文字。R41 于 2026-09-20T14:14Z 在任期内刷新读数(不是坐席也不是收班):盘点表、缝卡行、台账合计、PR 节与标题全部换成同一批 REST 实测值 —— 上一版停在 09-18T16:12Z,已落后约 46 小时,继任者照着读会把 42 张已关的卡当成在队。⛔ 本次未动「当前 PM」的坐席依据与判例、harness 表、「范围」「热文件串行队」「说明」三节、事实 1–59、两段禁令,也未动「继承台账」里 State-machine 破损表与 Retired inheritance 两块;09-18T16:12Z 的四段台账明细与决策箱清空那一块保留作历史,只在上面加了退役标注。
R41/R42 于 2026-09-30T06:07Z 收班:重写「当前 PM」为 ⏳ vacant + 接任台账、删巡查 Routine。⛔ 本次未动 harness 表、「范围」「继承台账」「热文件串行队」「说明」与事实 1–59、两段禁令。
R43 坐席 (opening marker 5906435762): rewrote 「当前 PM」 only. ⛔ No other section changed; the harness table is still R41's record, and R43's reading is in the opening marker.
Generated by Claude Code