Skip to content

fix(file-search): increase indexing worker memory - #7963

Merged
waleedlatif1 merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
codex/increase-file-index-worker-memory
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

waleedlatif1 merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
codex/increase-file-index-worker-memory

Conversation

@icecrasher321

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Increase workspace-file-search-index from medium-1x (2 GB) to medium-2x (4 GB) to give document parsers more memory before chunking.
  • Update the existing task configuration test and document why parser memory needs a separate budget from indexed text size.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix

Testing

Existing task and file-search unit tests, application type check, lint, all repository audits, block registry, and docs manifest checks.

Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Self-reviewed my changes
  • Tests added/updated and passing
  • No new warnings introduced
  • I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms outlined in the Contributor License Agreement (CLA)

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

1 Skipped Deployment
Project Deployment Actions Updated
docs Skipped Skipped Sep 18, 2026 5:47am UTC

Request Review

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Sep 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

RetriggerConfidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because it makes a narrowly scoped, consistently tested worker-memory increase using an established machine preset.

Summary

This PR increases the workspace file-search indexing task’s Trigger.dev worker from medium-1x to medium-2x.

  • Updates the configuration test to protect the larger worker preset.
  • Documents the parser-specific memory rationale and separation between parser memory, complexity guards, and indexed-text limits.
  • No security-sensitive behavior, data contracts, or indexing logic are changed.

Reviews (1) · Last reviewed commit: "fix(file-search): increase indexing work..."

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 3 files

Confidence score: 5/5

  • Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
  • No files require special attention.

Re-trigger cubic

@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 merged commit fe1c91f into staging Sep 18, 2026
34 checks passed
@waleedlatif1
waleedlatif1 deleted the codex/increase-file-index-worker-memory branch September 18, 2026 05:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants