Skip to content

Add tokenizer tests for processing instructions #199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
annevk merged 1 commit into from
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

Add tokenizer tests for processing instructions #199

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions tokenizer/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ tokens are:
["StartTag", name, {attributes}]
["EndTag", name]
["Comment", data]
["ProcessingInstruction", data]
["Character", data]

`public_id` and `system_id` are either strings or `null`. `correctness`
Expand Down
20 changes: 9 additions & 11 deletions tokenizer/test2.test
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -183,19 +183,17 @@
{ "code": "invalid-first-character-of-tag-name", "line": 1, "col": 3 }
]},

{"description":"Simili processing instruction",
{"description":"Processing instruction",
"input":"<?namespace>",
"output":[["Comment", "?namespace"]],
"errors":[
{ "code": "unexpected-question-mark-instead-of-tag-name", "line": 1, "col": 2 }
]},
"output":[["ProcessingInstruction", "namespace", ""]]},

{"description":"A bogus comment stops at >, even if preceded by two dashes",
"input":"<?foo-->",
"output":[["Comment", "?foo--"]],
"errors":[
{ "code": "unexpected-question-mark-instead-of-tag-name", "line": 1, "col": 2 }
]},
{"description":"A processing instruction delimited by ?> doesn't contain the delimiting ?",
"input":"<?foo bar?>",
"output":[["ProcessingInstruction", "foo", "bar"]]},

{"description":"A processing instruction's data delimited by ?> contains the correct amount of ?",
"input":"<?foo bar??>",
"output":[["ProcessingInstruction", "foo", "bar?"]]},

{"description":"Unescaped <",
"input":"foo < bar",
Expand Down
Loading
Loading