Skip validation when accessing storage scalar of extension scalar

[robert3005]

This was already validated and current implementation panics

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 3.38%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2199 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 218 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	WallTime	dict_canonicalize_gt_u8_avx2[16000000]	6.8 ms	11.5 ms	-40.97%
❌	WallTime	words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536]	8.2 µs	9.3 µs	-11.78%
⚡	WallTime	dict_canonicalize_gt_u8_neon[1000000]	561.1 µs	486.9 µs	+15.22%
⚡	Simulation	allocate_drop_vortex_minimal_alignment[0]	1,077.2 ns	968.9 ns	+11.18%
⚡	Simulation	allocate_drop_vortex[0]	1.1 µs	1 µs	+10.57%
⚡	Simulation	allocate_drop_bytes[0]	581.3 ns	527.2 ns	+10.27%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing rk/storagevalid (a06f918) with develop (022c604)}

Footnotes

1. 218 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[github-actions]

This PR has been marked as stale because it has been open for 14 days with no activity. Please comment or remove the stale label if you wish to keep it active, otherwise it will be closed in 7 days