Repository navigation
Skip validation when accessing storage scalar of extension scalar - #9875
robert3005 wants to merge 2 commits into
Performance Regression: -3.38%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2199 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 218 skipped benchmarks1
Warning
Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | dict_canonicalize_gt_u8_avx2[16000000] |
6.8 ms | 11.5 ms | -40.97% |
| ❌ | WallTime | words_gather_scalar_avx2[65536] |
8.2 µs | 9.3 µs | -11.78% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | dict_canonicalize_gt_u8_neon[1000000] |
561.1 µs | 486.9 µs | +15.22% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | allocate_drop_vortex_minimal_alignment[0] |
1,077.2 ns | 968.9 ns | +11.18% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | allocate_drop_vortex[0] |
1.1 µs | 1 µs | +10.57% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | allocate_drop_bytes[0] |
581.3 ns | 527.2 ns | +10.27% |
Tip
Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing rk/storagevalid (a06f918) with develop (022c604)
Footnotes
-
218 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩